anti-prose. random matter.
it's not all manicures, laziness, and stupidity.
Published on March 13, 2004 By crimson In Politics
I have been following the blogs that feature welfare dependiency, poverty, and other related issues and responses with great interest. I'm a little disappointed that rarely has dominant governing systems and their impact on certain minority groups have ever been made an issue. What I am about the write has a lot to do with race and I speak from a Canadian perspective, and from the imposed-upon race. Mind you, these issues can be applied to every other Aboriginal/Aborigine/Apartheid group that have faced interaction from a colonizing entity. Georgraphical differences are present; the aftereffects are not.

Unless some major changes are made, the state of welfare dependency among Aboriginal peoples will continue. According to a 1986 census (which can probably still be found on the Canadian government website) nearly 60% of on-reserve Natives depend solely on welfare to exist/survive. Granted, this data was provided 8 years ago, but the only difference that might stand today is the the numbers have increased with the population growth over this period of time, not decreased. At that time there was an estimated 500,000 Aboriginals in Canada. That number has nearly doubled since then.

Why are Aboriginal people so dependent on welfare? Because the imposition of the reserve system was designed to remove undesired people from their valuable homelands to smaller tracts of land that were generally useless. They were removed from their previous homes to make way for more non-Native people, housing, corporate development and enterprise. Many bands live in areas that are geographically situated away from white/non-Native communities. Their reserve becomes home only to a few jobs, and the ecosystem that they now reside in are limited in providing adequate sustainablility either through growth in population, pollution, limited hunting grounds, and over-farming of limited resources. The land base that once provided a great population, has been decreased to these users so that there is just no way of going back to life of living off the land.

What are the options? Remaning on welfare and living within the community, or relocating to a larger urban areas and becoming assimilated into non-Native way of life... an equally accepted outcome of segregationist and cultural/racial genocide initiatives. The more that move to the cities, the less of a chance of maintaining cultural ways and relations. Schooling programs fail to work. The only difference is now, instead of having uneducated people on reserve, we have many with degrees with little way to put them to use. Training with the specific geographical area in mind is an answer, but few are making this decision, and even fewer offer the opportunity to learn.

And what of other corporations? Will they instead relocate to higher poverty areas in order to employ more people that exist on welfare? Of course not. Citing a lack of relative work skills and training is not acceptable, anyone can be trained with the intent and encouragement of an employer. They don't even have to front the money for training, allocations of monies for job training is already a component within the welfare/Aboriginal training system.

Feel free to add to this citeless and ongoing comment on a different perspective of welfare dependence. I could add more citations and will if requested, but I can assure you, that these are not made up statistics and postulations. This is the reality of Aboriginal poverty, the causes, and projected future without change. This concerns on-reserve welfare dependency issues, but there are just as many reasons for its continued use off-reserve. In your city. In your neighborhood.

Finally, please note that while I am writing this with 'aboriginal' being the ethnic group in point, many others are affected similarily. For those who were relocated to 'better urban housing' that mostly caters to the same ethnicity, there are surrounding areas that will not employ due to racial discrimination. There is a reason why the majority of the rich and prosperous is of a Caucasian background. While racism is being fought against in today's society, the past continues to hold up barriers for success in the future.
Comments
on Mar 13, 2004
Some U.S. tribes have managed to get out of the welfare trap. Casinos helped some and hurt others, but the choctaws developed industry. I'm not sure how they are doing now, but they were doing well for a while. There is a tribe I read about, whose name I don't remember who stopped drinking as a tribe. I haven't heard how they've done either. I think in order for native/aboriginal peoples to escape the welfare trap, they need to find something to support themselves on the reservation. I wonder how the Arizonia tribes that have tours of the Grand Canyon fare?

on Mar 13, 2004
Casinos are slowly becoming an option for certain reserves. It brings in a lot of money, but i have seen little evidence that reserves are directly receiving this money. There are also a lot of 'dry' reserves too, and it solves certain problems, but many choose to do their drinking in nearby non-reserve areas... it's not completely successful, but better than nothing. I think education is truly the key... and not just for people wanting to get degrees in philosophy. More attention at economic development, agriculture, and realistic self-employment initiatives focusing on implementing strategies at the reserve level will go a long way. Thanks for responding, Sherye. I appreciate it!
on Mar 17, 2004
Excellent article! I read somewhere a while back, that in order to get on welfare, they had to sell some of their acres. That each person was given 40 acres, but it was considered toomuch of an asset, so they sold 35 acres. I'll have to finvestigate more. I don't know how I missed this article!
on Mar 17, 2004
oops, investigate
on Mar 17, 2004
As someone who has done work with both Oklahoma and Oregon Native American areas, I have some things to say about this article. Casinos do benefit some members of some tribes, but the people who are most often benefited are the white people who are hired to manage the casino. I say white people because in every casino I myself have seen, and I've seen hundreds, though I do not gamble, the management company and staff have been controlled by white people. Usually the people who are receiving the benefit are the chiefs of the tribe, some of these chiefs are good about making sure the money gets out to their tribe, but, since there exists virtually no watchdogging of the chief's actions, many chiefs take the money for themselves and their cronies. I use as an example the showdown between state police and the Cherokee Chief in Oklahoma. Most reservations have no resources worth using, that's why they are still reservations and not taken over by the US government. Integration is very hard outside of the reservation because there is still a great deal of racism aimed towards Native Americans.

Most Native Americans don't want to be on welfare. The problem is endemic because they can not earn enough on the reservation to leave and find better jobs elsewhere, nor can they get the education they need, since the BIA is chronically underfunded.

How can this problem be solved? If there were greater accountability of the chiefs then more of the money that's supposed to benefit the whole tribe, actually would go to them. This is something that tribes are going to have to do for themselves however, since the US government is extremely unwilling to meddle in the affairs of American Indians.

Cheers
on Mar 18, 2004
If there were greater accountability of the chiefs then more of the money that's supposed to benefit the whole tribe, actually would go to them.


I tend to agree with this statement. On many reserves that are home to a small population, band councils are often comprised of members of particular families and close friends. Even though elections are held periodically, often it is the same family that gets elected, although positions might change in the governing structure.

One of the methods to combat this problem involve third-party management- a committee overlooks the ongoings of the band. Does this work out? It depends on how receptive certain bands are to the idea. Third party management is sometimes comprised of non-Native workers... occasionally just this difference is enough to have certain people complain about it.

I often thought that a better idea would be to have reserves hire off-reserve consultants (the less entwined with the community, the more impartial a consultant could be) but even this could be considered unsatisfactory.

Thanks for your post, jeblackstar.

on Mar 18, 2004
See the Choctaw website to see what they are doing as a tribe. choctaw.org